본 연구의 목적은 2030서울생활권계획의공원공급계획 시 사용되는 공원 수요 추정 방법에 가로망 형태를반영한다면 실효성이 있는지 분석하고 그 정도의 차이를 비교하는것이다. 2030서울생활권계획에서는 공원을 공급하기 위한 공원수요 추정 방법 지표로 보행이용, 공원공급지수, 주민의견을 이용하고 있다. 따라서 첫째, 어떤 분석 방법이 가로망 형태를 담는 공원의 ‘보행이용’ 면적을 추출할 수 있는지 논의한다. 둘째, 가로망형태에 따라 ‘공원 공급’ 정도의 차이가 있는지 검증한다. 셋째, 가로망 형태에 따라 공원을 원하는 ‘주민의견’이 다른지 확인한다.
This study aims to identity the effectiveness of park demand estimation methods according to the type of the road network, focusing on the local living area of the 2030 Seoul Community Plan. First, the local living areas are classified according to their road network form. To determine the difference in park demands between the types of local living areas according to the type of the road network, the effectiveness is verified, focusing on the park planning method of the 2030 Seoul Community Plan (pedestrian service area, park supply index, and residents’ opinion). In the case of the pedestrian service area, extracting the pedestrian service area through network analysis is appropriate for containing the road network form. In the case of the park supply index, the more irregular the road network form, the higher is the park supply index, indicating that the supply of facilities is more than the supply standards in Seoul. In the case of residents’ opinion, the results are not statistically valid, but this is still considered an important planning method because the Community Plan is a resident-centered bottom-up plan. The Community Plan that contains the characteristics of the road network form in each living area will allow more citizens to enjoy parks within the same service area.