표제지
목차
제1장 서론 12
1.1. 연구 배경 12
1.1.1. 설계품질관리의 중요성 12
1.1.2. 공공 시설사업의 설계품질관리 현황 15
1.2. 기존 연구동향 18
1.2.1. 설계관리에 대한 연구 18
1.2.2. 설계자·시공자 간의 의사소통에 대한 연구 19
1.3. 연구 목적 22
1.3.1. 설계검토 지침 개발 22
1.3.2. 설계제도 개선 22
1.4. 연구의 범위 및 방법 25
1.4.1. 연구의 범위 25
1.4.2. 연구의 방법 25
제2장 공공 건축사업의 설계검토 현황 28
2.1. 국내 공공 건축사업에 대한 설계검토 업무 현황 28
2.1.1. 설계검토 업무 도입배경 28
2.1.2. 설계검토 업무 확대경과 31
2.1.3. 설계검토 업무의 근거규정 및 주요 검토내용 33
2.1.4. 설계검토 업무 사례 38
2.1.5. 설계검토 업무 성과 41
2.1.6. 설계검토 자문위원회 46
2.1.7. 설계검토 단계 48
2.2. 국외 발주기관별 설계품질관리 업무 현황 51
2.2.1. 미국의 설계품질관리 업무 현황 52
2.2.2. 일본의 설계품질관리 업무 현황 53
2.2.3. 국외 설계품질관리 현황 분석결과 54
2.3. 조달청 설계검토 업무 문제점 56
2.3.1. 인적자원 측면 56
2.3.2. 시스템 측면 57
제3장 설계검토 사례 분석 58
3.1. 조달청의 설계도서 검토의견 분석 58
3.1.1. 계획설계도서 검토의견 분석 59
3.1.2. 중간설계도서 검토의견 분석 60
3.1.3. 실시설계도서 검토의견 분석 61
3.2. 조달청의 설계변경 사례 분석 63
3.3. 주요 설계검토 주제 도출 64
제4장 설계검토 개선 방안 66
4.1. 설계 적정성 검토 지침 66
4.1.1. 계획설계 67
4.1.2. 중간설계 79
4.1.3. 실시설계 101
4.2. 설계변경 타당성 검토 지침 118
4.2.1. 설계변경 관련 국내기준에 대한 세부내용 이해 118
4.2.2. 설계변경 타당성 검토의 실무 이해 130
제5장 설계제도 개선 방안 135
5.1. 적정 공사기간 산정 135
5.1.1. 제도개선 배경 및 목적 135
5.1.2. 연구범위와 방법 137
5.1.3. 적정 공사기간 산정에 대한 연구동향 137
5.1.4. 정부의 인식변화 및 현행제도 한계 138
5.1.5. 개선방향 설정을 위한 현행 공기산정 기준 및 공사기간 분석 139
5.1.6. 적정 공사기간 산정 개선방안 149
5.2. 건설폐기물량 산정기준 정립 154
5.2.1. 제도개선 배경 154
5.2.2. 관련제도 개요 154
5.2.3. 현황 및 문제점 156
5.2.4. 연구추진 세부내용 157
5.2.5. 연구성과 159
5.2.6. 연구성과 도출을 위한 노력 및 효과 161
제6장 결론 163
6.1. 설계검토 지침 개발 163
6.1.1. 설계적정성 검토 지침 163
6.1.2. 설계변경 타당성 검토 지침 165
6.2. 설계제도 개선 166
6.2.1. 적정 공사기간 산정 166
6.2.2. 건설폐기물량 산정기준 정립 167
참고문헌 169
ABSTRACT 174
부록 177
[부록 1] 건설폐기물량 산정기준 정립 관련 연구자료 177
[부록 2] 설계검토 업무사례 179
Table. 1.1. Purpose and effectiveness of quality control 13
Table. 1.2. Major causes of design change in construction projects 14
Table. 1.3. Analysis of negative factors in construction projects 15
Table. 1.4. Analysis of existing research literature 18
Table. 1.5. Expenses that have been customarily and unreasonably spent by the construction company 23
Table. 1.6. The procedure of the study 26
Table. 2.1. Current status of design changes for target projects that need to manage project costs from 2009 to 2011 30
Table. 2.2. Analysis of reasons for adjustment of contract amount for 26 completed projects 30
Table. 2.3. The amount reviewed by the Public Procurement Service compared to the original construction cost budget by year 32
Table. 2.4. Target business and basis rules for 'review on adequacy of design' 34
Table. 2.5. Target business and basis rules for 'review on feasibility of design changes' 34
Table. 2.6. Main contents of review of 'review on adequacy of design' 35
Table. 2.7. Effect of 'review on adequacy of design' 36
Table. 2.8. Target, basis, and timing for 'review on economics of design' 37
Table. 2.9. Main contents of review of 'review on feasibility of design changes' 37
Table. 2.10. Working process of 'review on adequacy of design' 40
Table. 2.11. Business performance of 'review on adequacy of design' from 2015 to 2020 41
Table. 2.12. Results of review of the amount of 'review on adequacy of design' ('13. 11. 1. ~ '20. 12. 31.) 42
Table. 2.13. Results of amount review for each design stage ('13. 11. 1. ~ '20. 12. 31.) 43
Table. 2.14. Performance of improvement through 'review on adequacy of design' 43
Table. 2.15. Results of review of the amount of 'review on feasibility of design changes' ('13. 11. 1. ~ '20. 12. 31.) 45
Table. 2.16. 4th Design review advisory committee 46
Table. 2.17. Change in number of design review advisory committee 47
Table. 3.1. Analysis of the reasons for design change for the customized service business of the Public Procurement Service 63
Table. 3.2. Derivation of main themes for 'development of guidelines and improvement of systems' 64
Table. 4.1. Checklist of tower crane selection stage 84
Table. 4.2. Standard specification by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport 85
Table. 4.3. Standard of estimate 85
Table. 4.4. Original specification 85
Table. 4.5. Improvement(draft) specification 86
Table. 4.6. Price inquiries over the phone(example) 90
Table. 4.7. List of application documents 133
Table. 4.8. Survey of unit price for increased quantity (form) 134
Table. 5.1. Procedure for submitting and verifying the basis for the calculated construction period 140
Table. 5.2. Calculation standard of construction period 141
Table. 5.3. Analysis target 143
Table. 5.4. Status of extension of construction period by building type 143
Table. 5.5. Actual construction period by building type 144
Table. 5.6. Standard construction period calculation formula of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport 144
Table. 5.7. Actual construction period compared to the standard construction period calculation formula of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure... 145
Table. 5.8. Actual construction period for each building type compared to the standard construction period calculation formula of the Ministry of... 145
Table. 5.9. Analysis of reasons for extension of construction period 146
Table. 5.10. Analysis of reasons for extension of construction period due to factors of ordering agency 147
Table. 5.11. Analysis of reasons for extension of construction period due to construction site factors 148
Table. 5.12. Review service for calculating the appropriate construction period 150
Table. 5.13. Results of application of review service to calculate appropriate construction period 152
Table. 5.14. Amount of waste generated per unit area 156
Table. 5.15. Amount of waste generated per unit 160
Fig. 2.1. The amount reviewed by the Public Procurement Service corrpared to the original construction cost budget by year 32
Fig. 2.2. Concept of review on adequacy of design' 38
Fig. 2.3. Business performance of 'review on adequacy of design' from 2015 to 2020 42
Fig. 2.4. Composition ratio by improvement type (number of cases vs amount) 44
Fig. 2.5. Number of advisors by type of specialized work 47
Fig. 2.6. Change in number of design review advisory committee 48
Fig. 2.7. Degree of influence on LCC(Life-Cycle Cost) by construction stage 49
Fig. 3.1. Opinions on major design reviews in the planning and design stage 59
Fig. 3.2. Opinions on major design reviews in the intermediate design stage 60
Fig. 3.3. Opinions on major design reviews in the detailed design stage 61
Fig. 5.1. Actual construction period compared to the standard construction period calculation formula of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure... 145
Fig. 5.2. Composition and contents of environmental management fee 155