Title Page
ABSTRACT
ABBREVIATION AND ACRONYMS
Contents
CHAPTER ONE. INTRODUCTION 16
1.1. Background of the research 16
1.2. Statement of the problem 19
1.3. Research questions. 20
1.4. Objective of the research. 21
1.5. Specific goals and objectives of the research. 21
1.6. The Scope of the study 21
1.7. Expected outcome of the research 21
1.8. Significance of the Study 22
CHAPTER TWO. LITERATURE REVIEW 23
2.1. Introduction 23
2.2. Operational Definition of the Key Terms 23
2.2.1. Sustainability 23
2.2.2. Pro poor projects 24
2.2.3. Tanzania Social Action Funds (TASAF) (Mfuko wa maendeleo ya Jamii) 24
2.2.4. Factors affecting 25
2.2.5. Saemaul Undong (SU) 25
2.2.6. Beneficiaries 25
2.3. Theoretical review 25
2.3.1. The sustainability Theory 25
2.3.2. Principles of Sustainability 27
2.3.3. Why Sustainability is an Issue 29
2.4. Community Sustainability 30
2.4.1. What is Community Sustainability? 30
2.5. Applying the Korean Saemaul Undong Strategic Guiding Principles for Sustainable Rural Development Project 32
2.5.1. What is Saemaul Undong (SMU) 32
2.5.2. Why Saemaul Undong now (SMU)? 33
2.5.3. How does Saemaul Undong (SU) relate to TASAF? 33
2.5.4. The five mutually reinforcing pillars of Sustainable Rural Development 34
2.5.5. The twelve Strategic Guiding principle of Saemaul Undong focusing on the three areas: 35
2.6. The Meaning of Pro poor projects and characteristics of sustainable projects 38
2.7. Building of Social Capital 40
2.7.1. Social Capital and sustainable local community development 41
2.7.2. Things to consider when Assessing Social Capital 42
2.8. Mindsets and sustainability 42
2.9. Theoretical and conceptual framework 43
2.9.1. Meaning of conceptual framework 43
CHAPTER THREE. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY. 47
3.1. Research design 47
3.2. Area of Study 47
3.3. Sampling design and sample size 48
3.4. Instrument of Data collection 49
3.5. Method of Data Analysis 49
3.6. Ethical consideration 51
CHAPTER FOUR. DATA ANALYSIS, PRESENTATION, INTERPRETATION AND DISCUSSION 52
4.1. Overview 52
4.2. Reliability Test 52
4.3. Demographic and social economic characteristics of the Respondents 53
4.3.1. Gender of the respondents 55
4.3.2. Age of the respondents 55
4.3.3. Family Size of Respondents 56
4.3.4. Education Level of Respondents 57
4.3.5. Household Head of Respondents 59
4.4. Factor Analysis 59
4.5. The role of the Government to ensure sustainability of pro poor projects 64
4.5.1. Organizational structures that affects sustainability of pro poor projects 64
4.6. The role of mindset programs and its influence on sustainability of pro poor projects 68
4.7. OTHER FINDINGS 72
4.7.1. Program Satisfactions 72
4.7.2. Program impact on beneficiaries life 73
4.7.3. Extent to which the Program had meet its objectives 74
4.7.4. Opinion on what has to be done to improve the program. 74
CHAPTER FIVE. SUMMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION 76
5.1. Introduction 76
5.2. Summary of Findings 77
5.2.1. Under demographic information 77
5.2.2. Factors affecting the sustainability 78
5.2.3. Under the role of the Governance 79
5.2.4. Mindset program 79
5.3. CONCLUSION 80
5.4. RECOMMENDATIONS 82
5.5. SUGGESTION FOR FURTHER STUDY 84
REFERENCE 85
LIST OF APPENDICES 89
요약 110
Table 1. Internal consistency assessment 52
Table 2. Respondents' social economic and demographic information in general 53
Table 3. Gender of the respondents 55
Table 4. Age of the respondents 56
Table 5. Household size 57
Table 6. Rotated factor loadings of best 22 questions (items) 60
Table 7. Summary of Rotated Factor Matrix, Eigen values and %Variance 62
Table 8. Organizational Structure that affects sustainability of pro poor projects 65
Table 9. Responses evaluation about TASAF program 72
Table 10. Responses regarding project impact on beneficiaries' life 73
Figure 1. Conceptual framework 44
Figure 2. Educational level of respondents 58
Figure 3. Household head 59
Figure 4. Screen plot confirming findings of 3 factors 62
Figure 5. Political and Government leaders dictate how to run the program score 68
Figure 6. TASAF Program addresses people's attitudes 69
Figure 7. Seminars field trips etc. score. 70
Figure 8. Training on technical know-how score 71