표제지
국문요지
목차
I. 서론 9
II. 대상 및 연구 방법 12
1. 연구 대상 12
2. 연구 방법 12
가. 굴절이상의 교정 12
나. 조절 반응량의 측정 14
3. 연구 자료 처리 방법 16
III. 결과 17
1. 검사 대상자의 일반적 특성 17
2. 완전교정시 눈의 굴절 상태 19
3. 완전교정시 조절 반응량 22
4. 저교정시 눈의 굴절 상태 24
5. 저교정시 조절 반응량 27
6. 완전교정과 저교정 상태에서 조절 변화량 비교 29
7. 성별에 따른 조절 변화량 비교 32
8. 우세안에 따른 조절 변화량 비교 38
9. 저교정 상태와 완전교정과의 조절 변화량 비교 45
10. 각 주시거리에 따른 시력과 조절 반응량의 상관관계 53
11. 각 시력에 따른 조절 자극과 조절 반응량의 상관관계 57
IV. 고찰 63
V. 결론 67
Abstract 70
References 73
Table 1. Precise value of the supplied model eye is indicated on the model eye stand (VD=12mm). 14
Table 2. Distribution of all subjects according to sex and age. 17
Table 3. Mean and standard deviation of all subjects according to refractive errors. 18
Table 4. Accommodation of fixation distance 5 m with spherical equivalence on the full vision correction(1.0). 20
Table 5. Accommodation according to fixation distances with spherical equivalence on the full vision correction(1.0). 20
Table 6. Accommodative responses according to fixation distances on the full vision correction(1.0). 22
Table 7. Accommodation of fixation distance 5 m with spherical equivalence on the low vision correction(0.7). 25
Table 8. Accommodation according to fixation distances with spherical equivalence on the low vision correction(0.7). 25
Table 9. Accommodative responses according to fixation distances on the low vision correction(0.7). 27
Table 10. Comparison between accommodative response changes on the full vision correction and low vision. 30
Table 11. Refractive errors according to sexes on the full vision correction and low vision. 33
Table 12. Accommodative responses according to sexes on the full vision correction(1.0). 34
Table 13. Accommodative responses according to sexes on the low vision correction(0.7). 35
Table 14. Refractive errors according to dominant eye on the full vision correction and low vision. 40
Table 15. Accommodative responses according to dominant eyes on the full vision correction(1.0). 41
Table 16. Accommodative responses according to dominant eyes on the low vision correction(0.7). 42
Table 17. Accommodative responses according to fixation distances accommodative stimulation on the full vision correction(1.0). 45
Table 18. Accommodative responses according to fixation distances accommodative stimulation on the low vision correction(0.8). 46
Table 19. Accommodative responses according to fixation distances accommodative stimulation on the low vision correction(0.7). 47
Table 20. Accommodative responses according to fixation distances accommodative stimulation on the low vision correction(0.6). 48
Table 21. Comparison between accommodative response changes on the full vision correction and low vision(OD). 50
Table 22. Comparison between accommodative response changes on the full vision correction and low vision(OS). 51
Table 23. Correlations between accommodative responses and visual acuites(OD). 54
Table 24. Correlations between accommodative responses and visual acuites(OS). 54
Table 25. Correlations between accommodative responses and accommodative stimulus(OD). 58
Table 26. Correlations between accommodative responses and accommodative stimulus(OS). 58
Fig. 1. Distribution according to refraction errors. 18
Fig. 2. Accommodation according to fixation distances with spherical equivalence on the full vision correction(1.0) (A: OD, B: OS). 21
Fig. 3. Accommodative responses according to fixation distances on the full vision correction(1.0) (A: OD, B: OS). 23
Fig. 4. Accommodation according to fixation distances with spherical equivalence on the low vision correction(0.7) (A: OD, B: OS). 26
Fig. 5. Accommodative responses according to fixation distances on the low vision correction(0.7) (A: OD, B: OS). 28
Fig. 6. Comparison between accommodative response changes on the full vision correction and low vision (A: OD, B: OS). 31
Fig. 7. Accommodative responses according to sexes on the full vision correction(1.0) (A: OD, B: OS). 36
Fig. 8. Accommodative responses according to sexes on the low vision correction(0.7) (A: OD, B: OS). 37
Fig. 9. Accommodative response changes according to dominant eyes on the full vision correction(1.0) (A: OD, B: OS). 43
Fig. 10. Accommodative response changes according to dominant eyes on the low vision correction(0.7) (A: OD, B: OS). 44
Fig. 11. Comparison between accommodative response changes on the full vision correction and low vision (A: OD, B: OS). 52
Fig. 12. Correlations between accommodative responses and visual acuites(OD). 55
Fig. 13. Correlations between accommodative responses and visual acuites(OS). 56
Fig. 14. Correlations between accommodative responses and accommodative stimulus(OD). 59
Fig. 15. Correlations between accommodative responses and accommodative stimulus(OS). 60
Fig. 16. Correlations between accommodative responses and visual acuity according to accommodative stimulation. 62