This research aims to improve the problems of current cadastral schemes and to build up social trust towards the metes and bounds.
The social mistrust towards the borderlines and accuracy is the source of conflicts over the borders, which stands out as a very serious social issue with respect to the operation of cadastral scheme.
In this paper, the causes of not being possible to suggest the incoherent borderline outcomes were introduced, which include the limitation of surveying the borderline restoration by cadastral mapping, differences in surveying origin and lack of surveying base point, the realistic differences between the map boundary and ground boundary, and limitation of borderline restoration by existing surveying output, and from such cases the problems were deduced in detail.
In order to resolve the aforementioned problems, cadastral surveying detailed diagram was implemented after setting the new borderline as a ground boundary, instead of map boundary, thus it was set to be further used as an important evidence for the decision of the borders.
Hereafter, it is to suggest the consistent and credible outcome of boundary surveying through these data for re-surveying.