표제지
감사의 글
국문요지
목차
Ⅰ. 서론 9
Ⅱ. 대상 및 연구방법 12
2-1. 연구 재료 12
2-2. 연구 방법 13
2-2-1. 소프트 콘택트렌즈의 측정 조건 13
2-2-2. 측정 방법 13
2-3. 연구 자료 분석 방법 14
Ⅲ. 결과 및 고찰 16
3-1. Dry blotting 방법 16
3-1-1. Dry blotting방법에 의한 검사자 1의 반복성 비교 16
3-1-2. Dry blotting방법에 의한 검사자 2의 반복성 비교 23
3-1-3. Dry blotting방법에 의한 검사자 1,2간의 비교 30
3-1-4. Dry blotting방법에 의한 비이온과 이온계 렌즈간의 비교 (검사자 1, 2 전체비교) 36
3-1-5. Dry blitting방법에 의한 저함수와 고함수렌즈간의 비교 (검사자 1, 2 전체비교) 38
3-2. Wet cell 방법 40
3-2-1. Wet cell 방법에 의한 검사자 1, 2의 반복성 비교 40
3-2-2. 환산굴절력에 필요한 환산인자 결정 44
3-2-3. 새로운 환산식에 의한 Wet cell의 검사자 1의 반복성 비교 48
3-2-4. 새로운 환산식에 의한 Wet cell의 검사자 2의 반복성 비교 55
Ⅴ. 결론 63
Abstract 65
References 67
Table. 1. Verification of soft contact lenses. 12
Table. 2. Data of power measured with dry blotting by examiner 1 16
Table. 3. Mean and standard deviations of total power measured with dry blotting by examiner 1 (-1.50D∼-9.00D, N=60, ANOVA, p〈0.05) 22
Table. 4. Data of power measured with dry blotting by examiner 2 23
Table. 5. Mean and standard deviations of total power measured with dry blotting by examiner 2 (-1.50D∼-9.00D, N=60, ANOVA, p〈0.05) 29
Table. 6. Comparison of powers measured with dry blotting by two examiners 30
Table. 7. Mean and standard deviations of total power measured with dry blotting by two examiner (-1.50D∼-9.00D, N=60, ANOVA, p〈0.05) 35
Table. 8. The comparison of power of nonionic and ionic lenses measured with dry blotting by two examiners 36
Table. 9. The comparison of power of low water and high lenses measured with dry blotting by two examiners 38
Table. 10. Data of power measured with wet cell by examiner 1 40
Table. 11. Data of power measured with wet cell by examiner 2 42
Table. 12. Factor of conversion equation 47
Table. 13. Data of the calibration power measured with wet cell by examiner 1 48
Table. 14. Mean and standard deviations of the measured total power with wet cell method by examiner 1 (-1.50D∼-9.00D, N=60, ANOVA, p〈0.05) 54
Table. 15. Data of the calibration power with wet cell method by examiner 2 55
Table. 16. Mean and standard deviations of the measured total power with wet cell method by examiner 1 (-1.50D∼-9.00D, N=60, ANOVA, p〈0.05) 61
Table. 17. Mean and standard deviations of total power measured with wet cell by two examiners (-1.50D∼-9.00D, N=60, Independent samples t-test. p〈0.05) 62
Fig. 1. Mean and standard deviations of power measured with dry blotting by examiner 1 (-1.50D). Dotted lines are standard deviation of the reproducibility. 18
Fig. 2. Mean and standard deviations of power measured with dry blotting by examiner 1 (-3.00D). Dotted lines are standard deviation of the reproducibility. 19
Fig. 3. Mean and standard deviations of power measured with dry blotting by examiner 1 (-6.00D). Dotted lines are standard deviation of the reproducibility. 20
Fig. 4. Mean and standard deviations of power measured with dry blotting by examiner 1 (-9.00D). Dotted lines are standard deviation of the reproducibility. 21
Fig. 5. Mean and standard deviations of power measured with dry blotting by examiner 2 (-1.50D). Dotted lines are standard deviation of the reproducibility. 25
Fig. 6. Mean and standard deviations of power measured with dry blotting by examiner 2 (-3.00D). Dotted lines are standard deviation of the reproducibility. 26
Fig. 7. Mean and standard deviations of power measured with dry blotting by examiner 2 (-6.00D). Dotted lines are standard deviation of the reproducibility. 27
Fig. 8. Mean and standard deviations of power measured with dry blotting by examiner 2 (-9.00D). Dotted lines are standard deviation of the reproducibility. 28
Fig. 9. Mean and standard deviations of powers measured with dry blotting by two examiners (-1.50D). Dotted lines are standard deviation of the reproducibility. 31
Fig. 10. Mean and standard deviations of powers measured with dry blotting by two examiners (-3.000D). Dotted lines are standard deviation of the reproducibility. 32
Fig. 11. Mean and standard deviations of powers measured with dry blotting by two examiners (-6.00D). Dotted lines are standard deviation of the reproducibility. 33
Fig. 12. Mean and standard deviations of powers measured with dry blotting by two examiners (-9.00D). Dotted lines are standard deviation of the reproducibility. 34
Fig. 13. Mean and standard deviations of power of nonionic and ionic lenses measured with dry blotting by two examiners 37
Fig. 14. Mean and standard deviations of power of low water and high water lenses measured with dry blotting by two examiners 39
Fig. 15. Relationship of the measured power and calibration power(ex1) 45
Fig. 16. Relationship of the measured power and calibration power(ex2) 46
Fig. 17. Mean and standard deviations of the calibration power with wet cell method by examiner 1 (-1.50D). Dotted lines are standard deviation of the reproducibility. 50
Fig. 18. Mean and standard deviations of the calibration power with wet cell method by examiner 1 (-3.50D). Dotted lines are standard deviation of the reproducibility. 51
Fig. 19. Mean and standard deviations of the calibration power with wet cell method by examiner 1 (-6.00D). Dotted lines are standard deviation of the reproducibility. 52
Fig. 20. Mean and standard deviations of the calibration power with wet cell method by examiner 1 (-9.00D). Dotted lines are standard deviation of the reproducibility. 53
Fig. 21. Mean and standard deviations of the calibration power with wet cell method by examiner 2 (-1.50D). Dotted lines are standard deviation of the reproducibility. 57
Fig. 22. Mean and standard deviations of the calibration power with wet cell method by examiner 2 (-3.00D). Dotted lines are standard deviation of the reproducibility. 58
Fig. 23. Mean and standard deviations of the calibration power with wet cell method by examiner 2 (-6.00D). Dotted lines are standard deviation of the reproducibility. 59
Fig. 24. Mean and standard deviations of the calibration power with wet cell method by examiner 2 (-9.00D). Dotted lines are standard deviation of the reproducibility. 60