Currently, it is a current market situation that Value Effecting (VE) must be performed from the basic stage in Design. In public local management office and local community, which are controlled by Ministry of Land Transport and Maritime Affairs, when they order of the design for on going construction project, all activities such as estimating VE budget have been systemized as they had to followable laws and regulations.
In domestic case, VE is recognized as an effective tool reducing business budget which is very economical activity. The government, with its budget reduction effort, made Design Value Effect as a duty for bidder in order to accommodate improving construction value.
Range of DVE(Design Value Engineering) in constructions is extended to more than 10 billion Won budget construction project. As a result, DVE orders are also increasing as well as the quantity. Order of DVE is constantly increasing, but there is a lack of standard and guideline during performing DVE in construction project. So because of the confusing performance between order and doer, we are not having opportunities in improving quality and economical use of resources. Therefore, in order to make simple in ordering DVE works and resolve problems in performing DVE works, we need a Standard Bid Guideline book which regulate all about DVE performance. And we also need a system support of relevant office's account standard.
In this study, we analyzed the real performances and adapted state in DVE performance in domestic and international. The analyzing is the followings.
1)We collected all relevant information and data in order to recognize problems and analyze domestic performance situations related to DVE performance.
2)We analyzed all domestic/international laws and regulation related to DVE, suggested development ways.
3)By analyzing past DVE biding performances in such as biding qualification, budget, DVE performance fee, we suggested development ways by doing comparison between each.
So, in this study, we analyze current VE bid performance, and we have conclusions as follows
1)By progressing VE performance with Workshop style in accordance with VE-Job Plan, we conclude efficient VE Review Result which reflects VE's basic purpose of Resolving problems in cooperation with each division, and of major improvement factors by analyzing techniques.
2)In time decision for performing DVE, bid office must give the proper standard in deciding performance time by performance type, and ordering style.
3)VE performance biding qualification includes wide range, so that it can be served with quality provided by professional VE firms.
4)It needs to educate the personnel with leadership to lead the VE team, and needs to institute educational courses of growing VE professional.