국문목차
표제지=0,1,4
목차=i,5,3
표목차=iv,8,2
그림목차=vi,10,6
감사의 글=xii,16,1
논문개요=xiii,17,2
I. 서론=1,19,1
A. 연구 배경 및 목적=1,19,2
B. 연구사=3,21,3
C. 연구 범위 및 절차=6,24,3
II. 연구 대상 현황=9,27,1
A. 일반 현황=9,27,4
B. 수문 현황=13,31,1
1. 조석조류 특성=13,31,1
2. 강우 현황=13,31,2
3. 수자원 현황=15,33,2
C. 수질 현황=17,35,1
1. 유입 지류 수질 특성=17,35,16
2. 새만금 수역 수질 특성=33,51,4
III. 연구 방법=37,55,1
A. 모델 선정=37,55,4
B. 모델 원리=41,59,1
1. 모델 개요=41,59,2
2. 수리 모델=43,61,3
3. 수질 모델=46,64,7
C. 모델 수정=53,71,6
IV. 해수유통단계 모델 적용=59,77,1
A. 모델 구성=59,77,3
B. 모델 수행 및 경계 조건=61,79,2
C. 모델 보정 및 검증=62,80,1
1. 수리 모델=62,80,7
2. 수질 모델=69,87,13
D. 연구 결과 및 고찰=82,100,1
1. 수리적 특성=82,100,11
2. 수질 특성=93,111,8
V. 담수호 단계 모델 적용=101,119,1
A. 새만금 담수호 반응 계수 산정=102,120,1
1. 연구 대상 하구 담수호 선정=102,120,1
2. 금강호 반응계수 산정=103,121,12
3. 아산호 반응계수 산정=115,133,12
4. 주요 반응계수 비교 및 검토=127,145,2
B. 모델 구성=129,147,1
1. 모델 구성 및 경계 조건=129,147,1
2. 담수호 수질대책=130,148,4
C. 모델 수행=134,152,1
D. 연구 결과 및 고찰=135,153,1
1. 수리적 특성=135,153,4
2. 수질 특성 및 관리 방안=139,157,32
VI. 결론 및 제언=171,189,1
A. 요약 및 결론=171,189,1
1. 해수유통단계=171,189,2
2. 담수호 단계=172,190,3
B. 제언=174,192,5
참고문헌=179,197,14
부록=193,211,25
Abstract=218,236,2
Table II-1. Annual rainfall, discharge and water utilization ratio=16,34,1
Table II-2. Means and ranges of water quality parameters at two incoming flows during 1999∼2004=18,36,1
Table II-3. Results of Seasonal Mann-Kendall Test at Mangyung watershed during 1995∼2004=26,44,1
Table II-4. Results of Seasonal Mann-Kendall Test at Dongjin watershed during 1995∼2004=28,46,1
Table III-1. Case studies of model application to Saemangeum=40,58,1
Table IV-1. Coefficient values used in GLLVHT=63,81,1
Table IV-2. Water quality coefficients and model constituents in WQDPM=71,89,1
Table IV-3. Coefficient values used in WQDPM=72,90,2
Table IV-4. Eutrophication criteria for flowing water system(EPA, 1985)=93,111,1
Table V-1. Characterishcs of estuarine reservoir=102,120,1
Table V-2. Coefficient values used in WQDPM=107,125,2
Table V-3. Coefficient values used in WQDPM=119,137,2
Table V-4. Reaction paramefer of artificial wetland=131,149,1
Table V-5. Concentration of inflow and outflow at the artificial wetland=132,150,1
Table V-6. Predicted results of water quality with government plans=140,158,1
Table V-7. Predicted results of water quality with Yongdam outflow change=158,176,1
Table V-8. Predicted results of water quality with discharge capacity change of circuit waterways=163,181,1
Table V-9. Predicted results of water quality with only circuit waterways=164,182,1
Table V-10. Predicted results of water quality with connected channel=165,183,1
Table V-11. Predicted results of water quality with phosphorus treatment facility=167,185,1
Table V-12. Predicted results of water quality with dilution water(Geum River)=168,186,1
Table V-13. Effect analysis of government plans=169,187,1
Table VI-1. Major facilities of alternative plan=176,194,1
Figure I-1. Study flow chart=8,26,1
Figure II-1. Location of the study area=9,27,1
Figure II-2. Process of Saemangeum Project=11,29,1
Figure II-3. Landsat photograph of the study area=12,30,1
Figure II-4. Annual variation of rainfall at Saemangeum watershed(1995∼2004)=14,32,1
Figure II-5. Monthly variation of rainfall at Saemangeum watershed(1995∼2004)=14,32,1
Figure II-6. Water utilization ratio=16,34,1
Figure II-7. Seasonal variations of water quality parameters at two incoming flows during 1999∼2004=19,37,1
Figure II-8. Stations used in trend analysis of Mangyung River watershed=24,42,1
Figure II-9. Stations used in trend analysis of Dongjin River watershed=27,45,1
Figure II-10. Three-dimensional contour map of BOD5(이미지참조)=30,48,1
Figure II-11. Three-dimensional contour map of Total Nitrogen=31,49,1
Figure II-12. Three-dimensional contour map of Total Phosphorus=32,50,1
Figure II-13. Location of water quality monitoring stations=33,51,1
Figure II-14. Water qualities of Saemangeum area=35,53,1
Figure III-1. Schematic description of GEMSS=42,60,1
Figure III-2. Schematics of parameters in GLLVHT=43,61,1
Figure III-3. Major water quality interactions in WQDPM=46,64,1
Figure III-4. Annual variations of TSS, Chl-a and Nutrients (a)Mangyung Bridge (b)Dongjin Bridge=54,72,1
Figure IV-1. Location of model boundaries and water quality monitoring stations=59,77,1
Figure IV-2. Horizontal model grid and model boundary conditions=60,78,1
Figure IV-3. Vertical model grids (a) Geum River, (b) Mangyung River and (c) Dongjin River=61,79,1
Figure IV-4. Location of tide observation tower=63,81,1
Figure IV-5. Calibration results of GLLVHT during Spring Tide=64,82,1
Figure IV-6. Verification results of GLLVHT during Neap Tide=65,83,1
Figure IV-7. Calibration results of GLLVHT - water temperature and salinity at surface layer=67,85,1
Figure IV-8. Verification results of GLLVHT - water temperature and salinity at surface layer=68,86,1
Figure IV-9. Calibration results of WQDPM - water qualities at M1 of surface layer=74,92,1
Figure IV-10. Calibration results of WQDPM - water qualities at M2 of surface layer=75,93,1
Figure IV-11. Calibration results of WQDPM - water qualities at D1 of surface layer=76,94,1
Figure IV-12. Calibration results of WQDPM - surface water qualities af D2 of surface layer=77,95,1
Figure IV-13. Verification results of WQDPM - water qualities at M1 of surface layer=78,96,1
Figure IV-14. Verification results of WQDPM - water qualities at M2 of surface layer=79,97,1
Figure IV-15. Verification results of WQDPM - water qualities at D1 of surface layer=80,98,1
Figure IV-16. Verification results of WQDPM - water qualities at D2 of surface layer=81,99,1
Figure IV-17. Comparison of tide elevation A tower=83,101,1
Figure IV-18. Comparison of tide elevation at B tower=84,102,1
Figure IV-19. Water circulation patterns at surface layer at dike 4.5㎞open stage=85,103,1
Figure IV-20. Water circulation patterns at surface layer at dike 2.7㎞open stage=86,104,1
Figure IV-21. Comparison of water circulation patterns (a) dike 4.5㎞open stage and (b) dike 2.7㎞open stage=86,104,1
Figure IV-22. Seasonal variations of residence time on the construction stage=89,107,1
Figure IV-23. Seasonal variations of surface salinity on the construction stage=91,109,1
Figure IV-24. Seasonal variations of bottom salinity on the construction stage=92,110,1
Figure IV-25. Predicted results of water qualities at M1=95,113,1
Figure IV-26. Predicted results of water qualities at M2=96,114,1
Figure IV-27. Predicted results of water qualities at D1=97,115,1
Figure IV-28. Predicted results of water qualities at D2=98,116,1
Figure IV-29. Predicted results of PO₄during Chl-a growing season=99,117,1
Figure IV-30. Predicted results of Chl-a during growing season=100,118,1
Figure V-1. Location of model boundaries and water quality monitoring stations=103,121,1
Figure V-2. Horizontal model gird and model boundary conditions=104,122,1
Figure V-3. Calibration results of GLLVHT and WQDPM at S1=109,127,1
Figure V-4. Calibration results of GLLVHT and WQDPM at S2=110,128,1
Figure V-5. Calibration results of GLLVHT and WQDPM at S3=111,129,1
Figure V-6. Verification results of GLLVHT and WQDPM at S1=112,130,1
Figure V-7. Verification results of GLLVHT and WQDPM at S2=113,131,1
Figure V-8. Verification results of GLLVHT and WQDPM at S3=114,132,1
Figure V-9. Location of model boundaries and water quality monitoring stations=115,133,1
Figure V-10. Horizontal model gird and model boundary conditions=116,134,1
Figure V-11. Calibration results of GLLVHT and WQDPM at S1=121,139,1
Figure V-12. Calibration results of GLLVHT and WQDPM at S2=122,140,1
Figure V-13. Calibration results of GLLVHT and WQDPM at S3=123,141,1
Figure V-14. Verification results of GLLVHT and WQDPM at S1=124,142,1
Figure V-15. Verification results of GLLVHT and WQDPM at S2=125,143,1
Figure V-16. Verification results of GLLVHT and WQDPM at S3=126,144,1
Figure V-17. Maximum growth rate of Chl-a (k₁c)(이미지참조)=127,145,1
Figure V-18. Phosphorus release rate from benthic sediment (SEDPO₄)(이미지참조)=128,146,1
Figure V-19. Horizontal model grid and model boundary conditions=134,152,1
Figure V-20. Seasonal variation of surface water temperature distribution=135,153,1
Figure V-21. Simulated isothermal variation(℃) at (a) near Shinshi sulice gate of Mangyung lake (b) near Garyuk sulice gate of Dongjin lake=137,155,1
Figure V-22. Seasonal variations of residence time with lake=138,156,1
Figure V-23. Location of water quality prediction with lake=139,157,1
Figure V-24. Predicted results of water quality at Mangyung lake=141,159,1
Figure V-25. Predicted results of water quality at Dongjin lake=142,160,1
Figure V-26. Seasonal variations of TN concentration at surface layer=144,162,1
Figure V-27. Simulated isoquant contour line of TN (㎎/L) at (a) near Shinshi sulice gate of Mangyung lake (b) near Garyuk sulice gate of Dongjin lake=145,163,1
Figure V-28. Seasonal variations of TP concentration at surface layer=147,165,1
Figure V-29. Simulated isoquant contour line of TP (㎎/L) at (a) near Shinshi sulice gate of Mangyung lake (b) near Garyuk sulice gate of Dongjin lake=148,166,1
Figure V-30. Seasonal variations of Chl-a concentration at surface layer=150,168,1
Figure V-31. Simulated isoquant contour line of Chl-a (㎎/㎥) at (a) near Shinshi sulice gate of Mangyung lake (b) near Garyuk sulice gate of Dongjin lake=151,169,1
Figure V-32. Seasonal variations of DO concentration at surface layer=152,170,1
Figure V-33. Simulated isoquant contour line of DO (㎎/L) at (a) near Shinshi sulice gate of Mangyung lake (b) near Garyuk sulice gate of Dongjin lake=153,171,1
Figure V-34. Feasibility analysis of water quality prediction at Mangyung lake=155,173,1
Figure V-35. Feasibility analysIs of water quality prediction at Dongjin lake=156,174,1
Figure V-36. Location of water quality prediction with Yongdam discharge change=157,175,1
Figure V-37. Predicted results of water quality with Yongdam discharge change (Man)=160,178,1
Figure V-38. Predicted results of water quality with Yongdam discharge change (T1)=161,179,1
Figure V-39. Predicted results of water quality with circuit waterways=163,181,1
Figure V-40. Predicted results of water quality with only circuit waterways=164,182,1
Figure V-41. Predicted results of water quality with connection channel=166,184,1
Figure V-42. Predicted results of water quality with P treatment facility=167,185,1
Figure V-43. Predicted results of water quality with dilution water(Geum River)=168,186,1
Figure VI-1. Alternative plan of Saemangeum lake for water quality management=177,195,1