영문목차
Title page=0,1,4
Abstract=i,5,2
Contents=iii,7,3
List of Tables=vi,10,1
List of Figures=vii,11,1
I. Introduction=1,12,4
1.1 Contribution=5,16,2
1.2 Related Work=7,18,6
1.3 Outline of the Thesis=12,23,1
II. Multimedia Data Management:A Survey=13,24,1
2.1 The Conventional Database Approach=13,24,2
2.1.1 The Relational Approach=14,25,2
2.1.2 The Object-Oriented approach=16,27,2
2.1.3 The Object-Relational approach=17,28,3
2.2 Integrating of Multiple Databases using Views=19,30,1
2.2.1 Integrating Relational Databases=20,31,3
2.2.2 Integrating Object-Oriented databases=22,33,3
2.2.3 Integrating Relational and Object-oriented databases=24,35,1
2.2.4 Integrating Semistructured data=24,35,5
2.3 Modeling Multimedia Data=29,40,1
2.3.1 Modeling Video Data=29,40,5
2.3.2 Modeling Time-based Media=33,44,4
2.4 An Ontology-based Approach=36,47,4
2.5 Motivation of the Thesis=39,50,2
III. The XML/M Data Model=41,52,1
3.1 Basis of the XML/M=41,52,2
3.1.1 Media Objects=42,53,2
3.1.2 Relationship Objects=44,55,8
3.1.3 Container Objects=51,62,5
3.2 The Dynamic Container Objects=55,66,2
3.2.1 The Container Generator=56,67,3
3.2.2 The Container Customizer=58,69,4
3.3 Version Management of Container Objects=62,73,1
3.3.1 Review of a version Model=62,73,2
3.3.2 Adaptation for Partial Update=63,74,8
IV. Enhancing Multimedia Semantics=71,82,2
4.1. Resolving Semantic Conflicts in XML tags=72,83,5
4.2. The Ontology-based Approach=77,88,2
4.2.1 Introduction to F-Logic=78,89,5
4.2.2 Building OntoMedia=82,93,5
4.2.3 Reasoning and Querying OntoMedia=86,97,7
V. The UniMedia Framework=93,104,1
5.1 Overview of the UniMedia Framework=93,104,3
5.2 UniMediaNews:a Prototype System=96,107,2
5.3 Analysis=97,108,8
VI. Conclusions and Future Work=105,116,2
6.1 Future Work=106,117,2
References=108,119,6
[abstract in korean]=114,125,2
[acknowledgement]=116,127,2
Table1.1. Comparison of the XML/M with other research prototype systems=9,20,1
Table2.1. Comparison of relational databases, XML Server, and Ontologies=38,49,1
Table3.1. MPEG-7's spatio-temporal relations=47,58,1
Table3.2. Result table of Figure 8=61,72,1
Table5.1. Comparison of the three approaches=100,111,1
Figure3.1 Examples of Media Objects=43,54,1
Figure3.2 Examples of Relationship Objects=46,57,1
Figure3.3/(Figure4) Spatial relations=48,59,1
Figure3.4/(Figure5) Temporal relations=50,61,1
Figure3.5 Examples of Single-Media Container Objects=53,64,1
Figure3.6 An Example of a Multiple-Media Container Object=55,66,1
Figure3.7 An example of content fusion and container presentation=59,70,2
Figure3.8 A Version Tree=65,76,1
Figure4.1 Examples of Semantic Conflicts in XML Data=75,86,1
Figure4.2 F-Logic Program for biblical persons and their relationships=81,92,1
Figure4.3 Part of OntoMedia=85,96,1
Figure4.4 An Example of Semantic Reasoning=87,98,1
Figure4.5 A Rule for Semantic Reasoning=88,99,1
Figure4.6 An Example of Temporal Reasoning=89,100,1
Figure4.7 A Rule for Temporal Reasoning=90,101,1
Figure4.8 An Example of Spatial Reasoning=91,102,1
Figure4.9 A Rule for Spatial Reasoning=92,103,1
Figure5.1 Architecture of the UniMedia Framework=95,106,1
Figure5.2 An example of a customized container object=97,108,1
Figure5.3 Workflow of the Conventional Approach=98,109,1
Figure5.4 Workflow of the NewsML Approach=98,109,1
Figure5.5 The UniMedia Approach=99,110,1