본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
22대 대한민국 국회 국회정보길라잡이 국회의원검색
회원가입 로그인
HOME

정보검색

소장정보 검색

국회도서관 홈으로 정보검색 소장정보 검색
결과 내 검색 동의어 포함
결과 내 검색 동의어 포함

-

목차보기

목차

1970년대 이후 영국 '신미술사(New Art History)'의 방법론 : 클락(T. J. Clark)과 폴록(G. Pollock)의 미술사 담론의 형성과 영향 / 全英柏 1

I. 글을 열며 1

II. 신미술사에 대한 '별칭'들 2

1. 클락의 '미술의 사회사' 4

2. 폴록의 '후기구조주의 미술사' 11

III. 글을 마치며 19

[주] 21

[참고문헌] 28

[요약] 30

초록보기

방법론의 차원에서 '신'미술사학의 혁신은 미술사의 역사에 큰 족적을 남겼고 그 이름은 이제 더 이상 낯선 용어가 아니다. 그러나 신미술사라는 명칭은 ‘새롭다’는 뜻 외에 내용적인 설명을 전달하지 못한다. 논문은 그 새로웠던 방법론을 당시 맥락에서 되새겨보고, 그것에 영향을 준 근본 사상이 구체적인 작품의 해설에 어떻게 작용하는가를 고찰하고자 한다. 따라서 이 글은 1975년부터 형성된 신미술사학의 문화적 배경과 그 담론적 토대를 고찰하는 연구라 할 수 있다. 구체적인 사례연구로 대표적 신미술사가인 클락(T.J.Clark)과 폴록(G. Pollock)의 방법론을 집중적으로 다룬다. 더불어, 90년대 이후 시각문화연구의 출현 또한 신미술사와의 연계성으로 제시한다.

The name of 'new art history' was turned up when Block and its seed-bed Middlesex Polytechnic held a conference in 1982 on 'The New Art History?'. Since the first public use of the discipline in England, it has gained many names such as 'social history of art', 'radical art history', 'critical art history' and 'post-structuralist art history'.

Those art historians under the name of new art history have developed a critique of the traditional art history, and pursued what could be called a 'horizontal' study of an object or range of objects. That is to say, they've highlighted the social conditions under which it was made, for whom, by whom, and most importantly, how it is signified in the cultural context. They've regarded that art is not hermetic and autonomous, but bound up with the social and economic structure of its time, as well as conditioned by artistic tradition and institutions.

That all sounds natural in terms of methodology of art history in these days. But it was received rather 'radical' back in 1970s - to be exact, in 1975 at Leeds University when MA course under the name of Social History of Art began. It means that new art history has drastically affected on the discourse of art history for the last 35 years. This research thus has been launched especially to look into academical backdrop and intellectual influence on this 'new' methodology of art history. I thought that it is necessary to take into account the British cultural background, its intellectual tendency in particular in which new art history was formed to be an established academic discipline.

This paper, therefore, explores what grounds under the discourse of new art history in terms of theoretical methods and how it works to the point of reading certain artworks in specific time and space from multi-layered perspectives. Among them, Timothy.J.Clark and Griselda Pollock are the representative art historians who are dealt in detail in this research. The former is introduced along the category of Social History of Art of which theoretical backdrop is mainly from Neo-Marxism. And the latter's perspective is shown as is charged with post-structuralist theories especially of Foucault and Lacan.

What Clark counts most in his sociological approach of art history is, above all, class and its social apparatus in visual representation. He has always shown however that artworks are only really intelligible within accounts that demonstrates their complex 'situatedness' within many contexts of relation to other forms of historical evidence.

On the other, in Pollock's case, sexual difference and its configuration in signifying network is what has been most concerned. Devoted to methodological approaches of semiotics and psychoanalysis particularly, she has been keen on what could be represented and what could not, focusing on sexuality and race as well as class.

Apart from their different approaches, Clark and Pollock as new art historians have pit themselves against the dominant art-historical account of history as anaemic background or inert backdrop to study the work of art, then they are equally critical of the 'mechanistic Marxist's notion that artworks simply 'reflect' ideologies, social relations, and history. Clark's and Pollock's social history of art has remained focused on questions to do with the way to make sense of specific artworks. In this paper, this has been analysed in relation to the British positivist tradition, which avoided general theoretical ideas in favour of piecemeal and eclectic approaches to their subjects.

Influenced by the revolutionary move set in 1968, new art history can be said to be an intellectual product of the late-sixties tolerance for left-wing and 'continental' ideas which has changed the nature of academic methods of art history. Since then, traditional style scholarship such as formalism and iconography has been challenged by new art historians like Clark and Pollock who were affected by the sixties brand of marxism and post-structuralism. In this paper I attempted to show how their fundamental bases for their methodology actually work in their reading of art works. Clark's reading of Courbet and Pollock's reading of Degas were examplified as case studies among many.

The issues that the new art history challenged are still in much use in most current art histories. Those are the tradition's claim to be value-free, its belief in the impartiality or neutrality of historians, its suspicion of theoretical reflection, its ignorance of aesthetics and criticism, its obsession with fact-gathering and its blindness to social structures and political conditions. Those criticism came up with the critical aspiration of the new generation of art history at that time. It seems important to trace and learn from the way new art history challenged and thus pushed the boundary of its discipline in order to cope with demands and enquiries of art history today.

권호기사

권호기사 목록 테이블로 기사명, 저자명, 페이지, 원문, 기사목차 순으로 되어있습니다.
기사명 저자명 페이지 원문 목차
미륵을 만나다 :감산사 미륵보살상의 형식과 의미에 대한 해명 李柱亨 pp.8-27

보기
둔황 막고굴 제220굴 <서방정토변>의 해석에 대한 재검토 :경전적 근거와 『관무량수경』과의 관계에 대한 문제를 중심으로 金惠瑗 pp.28-53

보기
남송대 정치 변동과 불사리장엄 周炅美 pp.54-85

보기
북방 다문천의 보탑 도상 해석 :도상 형성 원인과 원·고려 이전의 양상 林玲愛 pp.86-115

보기
17세기 중후반 운혜파의 조상 활동 :운혜와 경림 宋殷碩 pp.116-145

보기
일제강점기의 조선 불교미술 조사와 복원 :한국 불교미술 연구의 출발점 姜熺靜 pp.146-173

보기
고려시대 청자 투합의 용도와 조형 계통 張南原 pp.174-201

보기
조선 중기 절파계 화풍의 형성과 대진 張辰城 pp.202-221

보기
도상학의 종말 혹은 또 다른 시작? :서양 중세미술을 중심으로 본 도상해석학의 연구동향 崔警熹 pp.222-271

보기
1970년대 이후 영국 '신미술사(New Art History)'의 방법론 :클락(T. J. Clark)과 폴록(G. Pollock)의 미술사 담론의 형성과 영향 全英柏 pp.272-303

보기
마이클 박산달과의 인터뷰 앨런 랭데일 pp.304-354

참고문헌 (26건) : 자료제공( 네이버학술정보 )

참고문헌 목록에 대한 테이블로 번호, 참고문헌, 국회도서관 소장유무로 구성되어 있습니다.
번호 참고문헌 국회도서관 소장유무
1 Memory of Art History 소장
2 마단사럽,『 후기구조주의와포스트모더니즘론』, 전영백옮김, 조형교육, 2005. 미소장
3 미술사와 시각문화의 정체성 소장
4 미술사, 신미술사, 시각문화연구 소장
5 Berger, John. Ways of Seeing, London: BBC & Penguin Books, 1972. 미소장
6 Clark, Timothy J.“ The Conditions of Artistic Creation,”The Times Literary Supplement (11 May 1974), pp. 561-562. 미소장
7 Clark, Timothy J., Image of the People: Gustave Courbet and the 1848 Revolution, Princeton University Press, 1982(2nd edition). 미소장
8 Clark, Timothy J., The Painting of Modern Life: Paris in the Art of Manet and His Followers, London: Thames and Hudson, 1985. 미소장
9 Clark, Timothy J., Farewell to an idea: Episodes of a History of Modernism, New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1999. 미소장
10 The Orthopsychic Subject: Film Theory and the Reception of Lacan 네이버 미소장
11 Debord, Guy. Society of the Spectacle, Detroit: Black & Red, 1977. 미소장
12 Farwell, Beatrice. Book Review of The Painting of Modern Life: Paris in the Art of Manet and His Followers in The Art Bulletin, vol. 68, no. 4 (December 1986), pp. 684-687. 미소장
13 AN INTRODUCTION TO THE HISTORY OF ENGLISH MEDIEVAL TOWNS by Susan Reynolds; 네이버 미소장
14 Harris, Jonathan. The New Art History: A critical introduction, London and New York: Routledge, 2001. 미소장
15 ART OR HISTORY? 네이버 미소장
16 House, John. Book Review of The Painting of Modern Life: Paris in the Art of Manet and His Followers in The Burlington Magazine, vol. 128, no. 997 (April 1986), pp. 296-297. 미소장
17 Public subjects and subject publics 네이버 미소장
18 Pollock, Griselda and Parker, Roszika. Old Mistresses: Women, Art and Ideology, London: Pandora, 1981. 미소장
19 Pollock, Griselda.“ The Gaze and The Look: Women with Binoculars－A Questions of Difference” in Dealing with Degas: Representations of Women and the Politics of Vision, Richard Kendall & Griselda Pollock, London: Pandora, 1992. 미소장
20 Pollock, Griselda, Avant-Garde Gambits 1888-1893: Gender and the Colour of Art History, New York: Thames and Hudson, 1993. 미소장
21 Pollock, Griselda, Generations and Geographies in the Visual Arts: Feminist Readings, London: Routledge, 1996. 미소장
22 Pollock, Griselda Differencing the Canon, London: Routledge, 1999. 미소장
23 Rees, A.L. and Borzello, Frances. The New Art History, Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press, 1988. 미소장
24 Shapiro, Meyer.“ Nature of Abstract Art,”Marxist Quarterly 1, 1937, pp. 77-98. 미소장
25 Fassbinder and Lacan: A Reconsideration of Gaze, Look, and Image 네이버 미소장
26 Solomon-Godeau, Abigail.“ Going Native,”Art in America, 77 ( July 1989), pp. 118-129. 미소장

추천서가 (다양한 추천 자료를 만나보세요)

권호기사보기

권호기사 목록 테이블로 기사명, 저자명, 페이지, 원문, 기사목차 순으로 되어있습니다.
기사명 저자명 페이지 원문 기사목차