[표제지 등]
표목차 vol1
그림목차 vol1
칼라 vol1
목차
군산분지의 석유자원 평가 연구/정태진;곽영훈;손진담;오재호;봉필윤;이호영;류병재;손병국;황인걸;권영인;이영주;김학주;박관순;박근필;선우돈;유동근 5
ABSTRACT 7
목차 11
제1장 서언 17
제2장 광역지질 18
제3장 고생물 연구 22
제1절 연구 방법 22
제2절 IIC-1X 공의 화분.포자 화석 23
1. 화석식물군의 특징 23
2. 생층서대 27
제3절 군산분지의 고생물 29
1. 미화석 산출 상태 29
2. 시대별 미화석상 33
제4장 층서 및 퇴적환경 38
제1절 층서 38
1. 층서 분대 39
2. 층서 대비 54
제2절 퇴적환경 58
1. 백악기 퇴적층 58
2. 팔레오세 퇴적층 63
3. 에오세 퇴적층 65
4. 올리고세 퇴적층 66
5. 초기 마이오세 퇴적층 67
6. 중기 마이오세 퇴적층 69
7. 플라이오세 퇴적층 69
제5장 저류층 평가 70
제1절 잠재 저류층 70
1. Kachi-1공 70
2. Haema-1공 71
3. IIH-1Xa공 72
4. IIC-1X공 72
5. Inga-1공 73
제2절 이암의 속성작용 73
제6장 근원암 평가 77
제1절 연구 방법 77
1. 유기물의 함량 77
2. 유기물의 타이프 결정 78
3. 열적 성숙도 판단 78
4. 석유생성 잠재력 80
제2절 결과 및 해석 80
1. 유기물의 함량 및 타이프 80
2. 유기물의 열적 성숙도 88
3. 석유생성 잠재력 93
4. 비투멘 분석 94
제3절 토의 103
제7장 물리탐사 자료해석 108
제1절 연구자료 및 방법 108
1. 연구자료 108
2. 자료해석방법 및 과정 114
제2절 중자력 자료해석 결과 120
1. 중력이상 120
2. 자력이상 122
3. 중자력 이상 비교 122
제3절 탄성파 자료 해석결과 124
1. 지질구조 124
2. 등층후도 135
3. 탄성파상 분석 141
제4절 시추공 대비 및 물리검층 자료해석 149
1. 시추공 대비시 층서상의 문제점 152
2. 시추공 구간별 퇴적상 157
제5절 지구조 발달 167
제6절 석유부존 유망성 검토 170
제8장 결론 175
참고문헌 178
PLATES 183
육상 함유가능분지 해석연구 -합천지역 1차 년도-/정태진;곽영훈;손진담;오재호;봉필윤;이호영;류병재;손병국;권영인;황인걸;이영주;김학주 197
ABSTRACT 199
목차 201
제1장 서언 205
제2장 지질 개요 207
제3장 층서 212
제1절 신동층군 212
1. 낙동층 212
2. 하산동층 213
3. 진주층 214
제2절 하양층군 214
1. 칠곡층 214
2. 신라역암층 215
3. 함안층 216
4. 진동층 217
제3절 유천층군 218
제4장 퇴적환경 219
제1절 신동층군 219
1. 낙동층 219
2. 하산동층 225
3. 진주층 233
제2절 하양층군 241
1. 칠곡층 241
2. 신라역암층 244
3. 함안층 246
4. 진동층 249
제3절 퇴적 환경 종합 251
제5장 퇴적암석학 253
제1절 사암 253
1. 신동층군 253
2. 하양층군 256
제2절 이질암 257
제6장 지화학적 연구 263
제1절 유기물의 원소분석 264
제2절 유기물의 Rock-Eval 열분석 266
제3절 비트리나이트 반사도 측정 267
제7장 결론 270
참고문헌 272
PLATES 275
판권지 288
군산분지의 석유자원 평가 연구 13
Table 3-1. Occurrence chart of palynomorphs from IIC-1X. 25
Table 6-1. Rock-Eval pyrolysis assay data of the Haema-1 82
Table 6-2. Pyrolysis assay data of Inga-1 86
Table 6-3. Pyrolysis assay data of IIC-1x 88
Table 6-4. Elemental composition of kerogen, Haema-1. 88
Table 6-5. Quantity and Composition of Organic Extracts, Haema-1. 95
Table 6-6. GC-MS analysis and Biomarker parameters, Haema-1. 103
Table 7-1. List of seismic survey and recording parameters 110
Table 7-2. Well data information in the Block I and II 111
Table 7-3. R.M.S. error of data set 113
Table 7-4. Map parameters used in this study. 117
Table 7-5. Acoustic characteristics and environmental interpretation of each seismic facies. 141
Table 7-6. Geologic age of the volcanics in Haema-1 and Inga-1. 150
Table 7-7. Stratigraphy of the Northern Depression, Yellow Sea Basin. 151
Table 7-8. Unconformity boundaries at Zucheng 1-2-1 well in twt(sec.) and geologic age 154
Table 7-9. Unconformity boundaries between 86II-104 and 96Y-135 lines. 154
Table 7-10. Classification of gamma-ray and SP curve shapes in terms of sedimentary patterns. 159
육상 함유가능분지 해석연구 202
Table 2-1. Stratigraphy of the Gyeongsang Basin in Hapchon-Changyong area 211
Table 5-1. Petrographic and Petrophysical data of Cretaceous sandstones in Hapchon-Changyong area. 254
Table 5-2. Illite crystallinity of the mudstone from the Hapcheon area 261
Table 6-1. Sampling location 264
Table 6-2. Summary of geochemical data 266
Figure 2-1. Geological basins developed in the Yellow Sea 19
Figure 3-1. Biostratigraphy of IIC-1X. 30
Figure 3-2. Major microfossil taxa in the Kunsan Basin. 37
Figure 4-1. Stratigraphy of the wells in Kunsan Basin 39
Figure 4-2. Columnar sections of the wells in Kunsan Basin 40
Figure 4-3. Stratigraphic correlation between the wells in Kunsan Basin. 41
Figure 4-4. Paleoenvironmental changes in the Cretaceous-Tertiary Kunsan Basin. 59
Figure 4-5. Columnar section of the Wido units. 61
Figure 5-1. Representative X-ray powder diffraction patterns showing variation in illite crystallinity. 75
Figure 6-1. Geochemical log of Haema-1 89
Figure 6-2. Geochemical log of Inga-1 90
Figure 6-3. Summary of Rock-Eval Pyrolysis Data 91
Figure 6-4. Elemental analysis data of kerogen on van Krevlen Diagram, Haema-1 92
Figure 6-5. Comparison between Bitumen and Hydrocarbon ratios, Haema-1 96
Figure 6-6. TOC versus extractable organic matter diagram of the Haema-1 well (Le Tran and Philippe, 1993). 97
Figure 6-7. Representative chromatogram of the alkane fraction, Haema-1 98
Figure 6-8. Variation of CPI against depth, Haema-1. 100
Figure 6-9. Variation of Pristane/Phytane against depth, Haema-1. 101
Figure 6-10. Ternary diagram for interpreting sterane distribution, Haema-1. 102
Figure 6-11. Plot of Ts/Tm against depth, Haema-1. 104
Figure 6-12. Plot of C29 % 20S/(20S+20R) sterane against depth, Haema-1 105
Figure 7-1. The location of seismic lines and wells 109
Figure 7-2. Gravity and magnetic survey lines. 112
Figure 7-3. Seismic section showing selected horizons. 116
Figure 7-4. Bouguer gravity anomaly map (C.I.=5 mgal). 121
Figure 7-5. Total magnetic anomaly map (C.I.=50 gamma) 123
Figure 7-6. Top of acoustic basement time structure map (C.I.=500 ms) 126
Figure 7-7. Seismic section showing basement high and half-graben in the study area. 128
Figure 7-8. Seismic section showing unconformity that separates post-rift sediments from syn-rift sediments. 130
Figure 7-9. Top of Blue horizon time structure map (C.I.=200 ms) 131
Figure 7-10. Seismic section showing fold structure near Kachi-1 well. 133
Figure 7-11. Top of Green horizon time structure map (C.I.=200 ms) 134
Figure 7-12. Top of Yellow horizon time structure map (C.I.=200 ms) 136
Figure 7-13. Isochron map of sequence 1 (C.I.=300 ms) 137
Figure 7-14. Isochron map of sequence 2 (C.I.=100 ms) 139
Figure 7-15. Isochron map of sequence 3 (C.I.=100 ms) 140
Figure 7-16. Seismic facies types recognized in the study area. 142
Figure 7-17. Seismic facies types of seismic sequences in the study area. 145
Figure 7-18. A schematic model for the evolutionary history of sedimentary sequence in the Kunsan Basin 148
Figure 7-19. Seismic section showing selected horizons near Zucheng 1-2-1 well. 153
Figure 7-20. Seismic section showing selected horizons near Huang-9 well. 156
Figure 7-21. Gamma-ray logs of Inga-1 well 160
Figure 7-22. Gamma-ray logs of IIC-1X well 166
Figure 7-23. Interval velocities at different shot points. 169
Figure 7-24. Seismic profile showing deep lake facies with well stratified strong reflection events. 174
Figure 2-1. Geologic map of Hapcheon-Changyong area. 209
Figure 4-1. Columnar section of the basal part of the Nagdong Formation. Arrowed features are described in the text. For location, see Fig. 2-1 (St: C1). 221
Figure 4-2. Columnar section of the lowermost part of the Nagdong Formation. For location, see Fig. 2-1 (St: C2). 223
Figure 4-3. Columnar section of lower part of the Nagdong Formation Arrowed features are described in the text. For location, see Fig 2-1 (St: C3). 226
Figure 4-4. Columnar section of the middle part of the Hasandong Formation. Arrowed features are described in the text. For location, see Fig. 2-1 (St: C4). 228
Figure 4-5. Columnar section of the middle part of the Hasandong Formation. Arrowed features are described in the text. For location, see Fig. 2-1 (St: C5). 230
Figure 4-6. Columnar section of the middle part of the Jinju Formation. Arrowed features are described in the text. For location, see Fig. 2-1 (St: C6). 234
Figure 4-7. Columnar section of the upper part of the Jinju Formation Arrowed features are described in the text. For location, see Fig 2-1 (St: C7). 239
Figure 4-8. Columnar section of the lowermost part of the Chilgog Formation. Arrowed features are described in the text. For location, see Fig. 2-1 (St: C8). 243
Figure 4-9. Columnar section of the lowermost part of the Silla Conglomerate. Arrowed features are described in the text. For location, see Fig. 2-1 (St: C9). 245
Figure 4-10. Columnar section of the middle part of the Haman Formation. Arrowed features are described in the text. For location, see Fig. 2-1 (St: C10). 248
Figure 4-11. Columnar section of the middle part of the Jindong Formation. For location, see Fig. 2-1 (St: C11). 250
Figure 5-1. X-ray powder diffraction patterns of clay fractions from the IIC-1X. R=0 I/S: randomly interstratified illite/smectite, I: illite, K: kaolinite, Q: quartz, I: R=1 ordered illite/smectite, R=3 I/S: R=3 ordered illite/smectite 259
Figure 5-2. Ilite crystallinity values based on Kubler vs. Weaver Index. 260
Figure 6-1. Plot of elemental analysis results of organic matter on the van Krevlen diagram 265
Figure 6-2. Thermal maturity of organic matter in Hapcheon area on the basis of vitrinite reflectance 269
List of Figure vol2
List of Table vol2
칼라 vol2
석유탐사자료 전산개발 연구 요약/서상용;정부흥;장성형;김중열;김유성;현혜자
대화식 탄성파 속도분석/서상용;정부흥;장성형 299
요약 301
ABSTRACT 303
목차 305
제1절 서론 309
제2절 트레이스 인덱싱 310
제3절 속도분석과 뮤트의 관계 311
제4절 뮤트함수의 변환을 이용한 속도분석 318
제5절 xva 프로그램 기능 321
5.1. xva의 주 메뉴 321
5.2. FILE 메뉴 321
5.3. VIEW 메뉴 324
5.4. SPECTRA 메뉴 326
5.5. VELOCITY 메뉴 326
5.6. MUTE 메뉴 326
5.7. STACK 메뉴 327
5.8. OPTION 메뉴 328
제6절 xva 프로그램 사용법 336
6.1. 입력 자료 준비 336
6.2. 작업 디렉토리 설정 336
6.3. Set Up 336
6.4. 속도 스펙트럼 계산 337
6.5. 속도 함수 선택 337
6.6. 동보정과 뮤트선택 338
6.7. 부분 중합 338
6.8. 완전 중합 338
6.9. 속도 분석점 추가 339
6.10. 속도 분석 결과 339
제7절 결론 341
참고문헌 341
천연가스 탐지를 위한 AVO 분석 연구/정부흥;서상용;장성형 343
ABSTRACT 345
목차 347
제1장 서론 351
제2장 AVO 분석을 위한 탄성파 탐사자료 처리 353
제1절 전산시스템 및 소프트웨어 353
제2절 탄성파 자료취득 354
제3절 탐사자료 입력 354
제4절 진폭보정 357
제5절 CDP 모음 357
제6절 디콘 및 고주파 필터링 361
제7절 F-K 필터링 361
제8절 DMO 보정 363
제9절 속도분석 및 중합 363
제3장 AVO 속성도 제작 및 분석 371
제1절 CDP 모음에서 AVO 분석 371
제2절 공통옵셋 모음에서 AVO 분석 373
제3절 유사 공통 주시 진폭 단면도 381
제4장 탄화수소 직접지시자 (Direct Hydrocarbon Indicator) 384
제1절 CDP 모음에서 AVO 절편과 기울기계산 385
제2절 선형상관 (Linear Correlation) 388
제3절 DHI 제작 및 해석 389
제5장 결론 395
참고문헌 396
3차원 석유 탐사자료 전산 처리/장성형;서상용;정부흥 399
Abstract 401
요지 403
목차 405
제1절 서론 411
제2절 3 차원 탐사 자료 처리 개요 413
2.1. 탐사자료의 특성 413
2.2. 구조보정을 위한 여유측선 (migration aperture) 415
2.3. 수진기 및 측선간격 결정 415
2.4. 격자 크기 결정 418
2.5. CMP 빈링 418
2.5.1. 동적빈링 (Dynamic binning or elastic binning) 420
2.5.2. 정적 빈링 (Static binning) 420
2.5.3. 플렉스블 빈링 (flex binning) 421
제3절 탐사자료 전산처리 423
3.1. 현장자료 준비 423
3.1.1. 항측자료 및 현장자료 입력[원문불량;p.138] 423
3.2. 자료처리 437
3.2.1. 최근접 트레이스 단면도 437
3.2.2. 이득회수 결정 437
3.2.3. 자동이득조절 (AGC) 440
3.2.4. 디콘 (Deconvolution) 440
3.2.5. 중합전 필터링 445
3.2.6. 공통격자 모음 단면도 (Common cell Gathers) 447
3.2.7. 속도분석, NMO 보정 447
3.2.8. 중합단면도 450
제4절 결론 458
참고 문헌 459
천부 향사구조 특성에 따른 배사형 유층구조 분해능 연구 -탄성파 모형실험을 중심으로-/김중열;김유성;현혜자 461
Abstract 463
목차 465
제1장 서론 471
제2장 탄성파모형실험 472
제1절 축소모형(KASH model) 제작 및 측정과정 472
제2절 축소모형실험 측정데이터 475
제3절 축소- 및 수치모형실험 결과의 상호비교 연구 484
제3장 결언 및 제언 513
참고문헌 515
판권지 516
Table 1. Field parameter for data acquisition(acqusition). 426
Table 2. Result of Binning. 426
Table 3. Result of Binning (1 km × 6 km area) 430
대화식 탄성파 속도분석 306
Fig. 1. Content of a simple index file showing SP, CDP, TRC, DIST, and byte-offset(byte-offet) respectively. 311
Fig. 2. The function gbu_dtrcrd() to directly read a trace. 312
Fig. 3. A velocity spectrum without mute. The panel(pannel) shows semblance(left), maximum semblance(middle), and the supergather(right). 313
Fig. 4. A velocity analysis panel(pannel) showing the velocity function(left), NMO corrected supergather with the mute-after-NMO times(center), and the stack(right). 314
Fig. 5. A velocity spectrum with mute. The spectrum is computed after applying the mute shown in the supergather. 316
Fig. 6. A velocity analysis panel(pannel) showing the revised velocity function (left), the NMO corrected supergather and the mute-after-NMO times(center), and the stack. 317
Fig. 7. Transform of a mute function from NMOC domain to T-X domain. The lower mute function is designed from the NMOC domain during the preliminary velocity analysis.... 319
Fig. 8. A velocity analysis by mute time transform. The mute time, shown in the middle panel(pannel), is designed from the previous velocity analysis.... 320
Fig. 9. A snapshot showing the xva window. 322
Fig. 10. A snapshot showing the FILE menu and its submenus 323
Fig. 11. A FileSelection Widget for selecting sort file. 323
Fig. 12. Selecting initial velocity analysis points 324
Fig. 13. A snapshot showing the VIEW menu and its submenus. 325
Fig. 14. A snapshot showing the SPECTRA menu and its submenus. 326
Fig. 15. A snapshot showing the MUTE menu. 327
Fig. 16. A snapshot showing the STACK menu. 328
Fig. 17. A snapshot showing the OPTION menu. 329
Fig. 18. The "General Options" popup menu. 330
Fig. 19. The "Super Gather Options" popup menu. 330
Fig. 20. The "Make Spectrum Options" popup menu. 331
Fig. 21. The "Contouring Options" popup menu. 333
Fig. 22. The "Make Stack Options" popup menu. 334
Fig. 23. A true amplitude stack section produced by xva. 340
천연가스 탐지를 위한 AVO 분석 연구 349
Fig. 2-1. Schematic diagram of 2D-seismic survey. 355
Fig. 2-2. Seismic data processing flow chart for AVO analysis. 356
Fig. 2-3. Raw shot gathers collected from Line A. 358
Fig. 2-4. Gain recovery test using the data from Line A. 359
Fig. 2-5. A hypothetical stacking chart (after Yilmaz, 1987). 360
Fig. 2-6. Input CDP gathers for deconvolution and high-pass filter analysis. 362
Fig. 2-7. CDP gathers of Fig. 3-6 after deconvolution and high-pass filtering. 364
Fig. 2-8. CDP gathers of Fig. 3-7 after the dip move-out (DMO). 367
Fig. 2-9. Velocity spectrum and normal move-out correction of CDP 250 of Line A using "XVA". 368
Fig. 2-10. CDP gathers of Line A after normal move-out (NMO) correction and muting. 369
Fig. 2-11(A) Filtered stack section of Line A. 370
Fig. 3-1. Input CDP gathers for AVO analysis of Line A. 375
Fig. 3-2. Enlarged stack section of Fig. 3-11(A) to define the range of AVO analysis. 376
Fig. 3-3. NMO corrected CDP gathers for AVO analysis on Line A from CDP 260 to CDP 380 at every 20 cdps. 377
Fig. 3-4. Common offset gathers of Line A selected every 150m offset interval from 300 m to 1500 m near target zone. 378
Fig. 3-5. Target reflector's AVO spectra of Line A. 383
Fig. 4-1. Linear fit of amplitude versus offset and standard deviation of CDP 360 of Line A. 387
Fig. 4-2(A) Display of intercept value calculated from extrapolating to zero-offset trace by a linear fitted straight line. The fitted line has relation of reflection amplitude versus sin²θ on NMO-corrected CDP gather of Line A. 390
Fig. 4-2(B) Display of AVO gradient value calculated from linear fitted straight line. The fitted line has relation of reflection amplitude versus sin²θ on NMO-corrected CDP gather of Line A. 391
Fig. 4-2(C) Display of correlation value calculated from linear fitted straight line versus reflection amplitude at each trace on NMO-corrected CDP gather of Line A. 392
Fig. 4-3. The DHI stack section of Line A. The DHI value is the product of the intercept, the gradient and the correlation coefficient. Background is the stack section displayed with the wiggle line. 394
3차원 석유 탐사자료 전산 처리 407
Fig. 2-1. (a) Raypath with flat reflector. (b) Raypath moving updip. (c) Aperture A, the additional distance to be recorded to provide data for migration processing. 416
Fig. 2-2. The 3-D aperture window frame. 416
Fig. 2-3. Derivation of the threshold frequency for spatial aliasing. Spatial aliasing occurs when the time difference between the arrivals at receivers A and B is one-half period (T/2) apart. 419
Fig. 2-4. Determination of optimum line spacing. 419
Fig. 2-5. When feather angle is 10°, midpoint associated with the receivers. 422
Fig. 2-6. Cable featherina as a result of currents smears depth point coverage 422
Fig. 3-1. A Flow chart for 3 D data processing 424
Fig. 3-2. A source location map for survey areas. 425
Fig. 3-3. A dual-source, dual-streamer survey design with 4 CMP lines are shown 427
Fig. 3-4. Attribute analysis for CDP fold and bin coverage to 45 survey lines before flexible binning are shown. Maximum fold is 265. 427
Fig. 3-5. The CDP fold in the bins to 45 lines after flexible binning are shown[원문불량;p.138] 428
Fig. 3-6. Attribute analysis for CDP fold and bin coverage to 45 survey lines before flexible binning are shown. Maximum fold is 60. 429
Fig. 3-7. A source location map for line 120i, 122 and 124. 431
Fig. 3-8. Attribute analysis for CDP fold and bin coverage to 10 lines before flexible binning are shown. Maximum fold is 265. 432
Fig. 3-9. The CDP fold in the bins to 10 lines after flexible binning are shown. 433
Fig. 3-10. Attribute analysis for CDP fold and bin coverage to 10 lines before flexible binning are shown. Maximum fold is 60. 434
Fig. 3-11. Zoomed midpoint locations in the bins. 435
Fig. 3-12. CDP fold coverage map. 436
Fig. 3-13. Raw shot gathers at shot point 101. 438
Fig. 3-14. A near trace gathers for 3 survey lines. 439
Fig. 3-15. Shot gather and its spherical divergence correction. 441
Fig. 3-16. Tests of automatic gain correction. A shot gather and its AGC are show under various circumstances. (a) input gather: (b)-(d) AGC parameter of 500, 1000 and 1500ms. 442
Fig. 3-17. Tests of deconvolution parameters. (a) input gather: (b)-(e) prediction lags of 4, 6, 8 and 10 ms. 443
Fig. 3-18. Tests of deconvolution parameters. (a) input gather: (b)-(e) deconvolution operator length of 60, 100, 200 and 280 ms. 444
Fig. 3-19. Tests of filtering before prestack. (a) input gather: (b)-(e) result filtering with some various parameters. 446
Fig. 3-20. Common Cell gathers with CDP bin number are shown. 448
Fig. 3-21. Semblance, velocity picking and NMO results are shown (by ProMAX 7.0). 449
Fig. 3-22. Stack section at the in-line 21 with CDP bin number. 451
Fig. 3-23. Stack section at the in-line 37 with CDP bin number. 452
Fig. 3-24. Stack section at the in-line 38 with CDP bin number. 453
Fig. 3-25. Stack section at the in-line 39 with CDP bin number. 454
Fig. 3-26. Stack section at the in-line 40 with CDP bin number. 455
Fig. 3-27. Stack section at the in-line 41 with CDP bin number. 456
Fig. 3-28. Stack section at the in-line 42 with CDP bin number. 457
천부 향사구조 특성에 따른 배사형 유층구조 분해능 연구 467
Fig. 1. KASH model : Model parameter mm, ㎲, mm/ ㎲ are converted to m, ms, m/s respectively. α, β correspond to P, S velocity. 473
Fig. 2. KASH model : The measuring procedure(roll-along) is illustrated with a basic source-receiver arrangement consisting of 40 channels. 474
Fig. 3. KASH model : Example of measured seismograms(vertical components, △t=1㎲) derived from shot 1....(이미지참조) 476
Fig. 4. KASH model : Adjacent seismograms(vertical components, △t=1㎲) from shot 6~15 are successively depicted.(이미지참조) 478
Fig. 4. KASH model : Adjacent seismograms(vertical components, △t=1㎲) from shot 26∼35 are successively depicted.(이미지참조) 479
Fig. 4. KASH model : Adjacent seismograms(vertical components, △t=1㎲) from shot 36∼45 are successively depicted.(이미지참조) 480
Fig. 4. KASH model : Adjacent seismograms(vertical components, △t=1㎲) from shot 46∼55 are successively depicted.(이미지참조) 481
Fig. 4. KASH model : Adjacent seismograms(vertical components, △t=1㎲) from shot 56∼65 are successively depicted.(이미지참조) 482
Fig. 5. KASH model : Selected shot points for illustrating the seismic wave propagation are indicated. 485
Fig. 6. KASH model : Ray path(P1P1 reflection) diagrams for the 6 source-receiver arrangements shown in Fig. 5 are depicted. 486
Fig. 6. KASH model : Ray path(P1S1 reflection) diagrams for the 6 source- receiver arrangements shown in Fig. 5 are depicted. 487
Fig. 6. KASH model : Ray path(S1P1 reflection) diagrams for the 6 source- receiver arrangements shown in Fig. 5 are depicted. 488
Fig. 7. KASH model : KASH model Ray path(P1P2P2P1 reflection) diagrams for the 6 source-receiver arrangements shown in Fig. 5 are depicted. 489
Fig. 7. KASH model : Ray path(P1P2P3P3P2P1 reflection) diagrams for the 6 source-receiver arrangements shown in Fig. 5 are depicted. 490
Fig. 8. KASH model : The measured seismogram(upper part) derived from shot 4 and the corresponding traveltime-distance curve (lower part) estimated by using ray tracing method are contrasted. △t=1㎲.(이미지참조) 492
Fig. 9. KASH model : The measured seismogram(upper part) derived from shot 29 and the corresponding traveltime-distance curve (lower part) estimated by using ray tracing method are contrasted. △t=1㎲.(이미지참조) 494
Fig. 10. KASH model : The measured seismogram(upper part) derived from shot 40 and the corresponding traveltime-distance curve (lower part) estimated by using ray tracing method are contrasted. △t=1㎲.(이미지참조) 496
Fig. 10. KASH model : Specific wave propagation indicated with arrow(upper part) is illustrated by traveltime-distance curve (middle part) and the corresponding(orresponding) ray diagram(lower part). 497
Fig. 11. KASH model : The measured seismogram(upper part) derived from shot 47 and the corresponding traveltime-distance curve (lower part) estimated by using ray tracing method are contrasted. △t=1㎲.(이미지참조) 498
Fig. 12. KASH model : The measured seismogram(upper part) derived from shot 55 and the corresponding traveltime-distance curve (lower part) estimated by using ray tracing method are contrasted. △t=1㎲.(이미지참조) 500
Fig. 13. KASH model : The measured seismogram(upper part) derived from shot 65 and the corresponding traveltime-distance curve (lower part) estimated by using ray tracing method are contrasted. △t=1㎲.(이미지참조) 501
Fig. 14. KASH model : Ray tracing method was used for the KASH model. Upper part : synthetic seismogram from shot 47. Lower part : traveltime-distance curves. 502
Fig. 15. KASH model : The wave field snapshots(vertical components) at twelve different time steps from shot 47 are displayed by using FEM based on the scalar wave equation. 504
Fig. 16. KASH model : The wave field snapshots(vertical components) at twelve different time steps from shot 47 are displayed by using FEM based on the elastic wave equation. 506
Fig. 17. KASH model : Results from physical and numerical modeling(FEM) are contrasted.... 509
Fig. 18. KASH model : is simplified to the extent that the anticline Acryl plate embedded in the Aluminum plate is replaced as the surrounding medium(Aluminum plate) 510
Fig. 19. KASH model : Results from physical and numerical modeling(FEM) are contrasted. Upper part : measured seismogram from shot 47 Lower parts : synthetic seismogram from shot 47. 511