국문목차
표제지=0,1,5
목차=i,6,3
List of Figures=iv,9,2
List of Tables=vi,11,1
ABSTRACT=vii,12,2
I. 서 론=1,14,2
II. 이론적 고찰=3,16,1
A. NOM의 특성=3,16,1
1. 일반적 특성=3,16,2
2. 유기물의 성상별 분류=4,17,4
3. Humic substance의 성상별 특징=7,20,2
4. NOM 분류=8,21,2
B. NOM 제에에 관한 문헌 연구=9,22,2
C. 수독부산물의 생성특성=10,23,3
D. NOM의 제거방법=12,25,1
1. 표준 정수처리=12,25,2
a. 응집처리=13,26,3
b. 흡착ㆍ전하중화반응=15,28,2
c. Sweep응집=16,29,2
d. Enhanced Coagulation=17,30,3
2. 고도정수처리=19,32,2
a. 분리막 공법=21,34,1
b. 오존처리기술=21,34,1
c. 활성탄흡착 처리기술=21,34,2
E. 정수장의 NOM 모니터링=22,35,1
III. 실험방법 및 분석방법=23,36,1
A. 실험방법=23,36,1
B. 분석방법=23,36,1
1. 수질분석=23,36,2
2. DOC. UV254 및 SUVA 분석(이미지참조)=24,37,1
3. 분자량분포 분석=24,37,3
4./(3.) NOM의 구조 분석=26,39,4
5./(4.) 전하밀도 측정=30,43,2
6./(5.) 소독부산물 생성능=31,44,2
IV. 결과 및 고찰=33,46,1
A. NOM 특성의 분석=33,46,1
B. 동복수원지의 DOC=34,47,1
C. NOM의 분자량 분포=34,47,2
D. 동복수원지의 NOM 구조분석=36,49,3
E. NOM의 전하밀도 분석=38,51,1
F. 소독부산물 생성능=39,52,1
G. 정수공정별 수질인자변화=40,53,3
H. 정수처리공정과 소독부산물 생성능=43,56,1
1. NOM의 농도 증가가 응집공정에 미치는 영향=43,56,3
2. 분말활성탄처리 후 응집에 의한 유기물 제거=46,59,2
3. 정수공정별 소독부산물 농도변화=48,61,1
4. 오존, GAC에 의한 유기물 제거=48,61,3
V. 결론=51,64,2
참고문헌=53,66,4
감사의 글=57,70,2
저작물이용허락서=59,72,1
Fig.1. Structure of humic acid=8,21,1
Fig.2. Structure of fulvic acid=8,21,1
Fig.3. Schematic illustration of reaction of various oxidants with natural organic material and reduced in organic substances=10,23,1
Fig.4. Mechanism for alum coagulation of humic substances=14,27,1
Fig.5. Liquid chromatography system(SEC)=25,38,1
Fig.6. NOM isolation diagram by using XAD resin=26,39,1
Fig.7. XAD resin의 back-bone structure:(a) styrene divinylbenzene(XAD 1,2,4), (b) acrylic ester(XAD 7,8)=28,41,1
Fig.8. Isolation resin=29,42,1
Fig.9. Prepared column=29,42,1
Fig.10. Accumulated resin in column(8㎖)=29,42,1
Fig.11. Installing column=29,42,1
Fig.12. Direction Flow=29,42,1
Fig.13. Elution NOM with 0.1N-NaOH=29,42,1
Fig.14. Titrino(Aiken et al., 1979)=30,43,1
Fig.15. HAAFPs pretreatment and analysis method=32,45,1
Fig.16. Variation of DOC in raw water=34,47,1
Fig.17. Molecular weight distribution in raw water=35,48,1
Fig.18. Compare NOM Structure in Yongyon raw water=36,49,2
Fig.19. Variation molecular weight distribution in Yongyon water treatment trains=37,50,1
Fig.20. Compared DBPFP with raw water=39,52,1
Fig.21. Variation UV254 and color in Yongyon water treatment trains(이미지참조)=40,53,1
Fig.22. Variation UV254 and SUVA in Yongyon water treatment trains(이미지참조)=41,54,1
Fig.23. Variation UV254 and DOC in Yongyon water treatment trains(이미지참조)=41,54,1
Fig.24. Variation NOM structure water treatment trains=42,55,1
Fig.25. Compared Turbidity with raw water and synthesis water in Jar-test=43,56,1
Fig.26. Variation with molecular weight distribution by coagulant concentration in Jar-test=44,57,1
Fig.27. Removal rate of molecular weight distribution by coagulant concentration in Jar-test=45,58,1
Fig.28. Variation Turbidity and DOC by coagulant concentration in Jar-test=45,58,1
Fig.29. Variation color by dosing PAC and Coagulant=46,59,1
Fig.30. Variation UV254 by dosing PAC and Coagulant(이미지참조)=47,60,1
Fig.31. Variation DOC remoal rate by dosing PAC=47,60,1
Fig.32. Aquatic organic matters characteristic in Ozone and GAC process=49,62,2
Table1. Humic substances classification based on solubility=4,17,1
Table2. Characterization of bulk NOM=5,18,1
Table3. Natural organic matter fractions and chemical groups=5,18,1
Table4. Present the THMFP and TOXFP of the different extracts=12,25,1
Table5. Removal efficiency for TOC(unit:%)=18,31,1
Table6. Enhanced coagulation maximum pH=18,31,1
Table7. Coagulant dose equivalents=19,32,1
Table8. Analytical methods=24,37,1
Table9. XAD resin property=27,40,1
Table10. Water quality of source water in Gwangju=33,46,1
Table11. Molecular weight distribution in raw water=35,48,1
Table12. Nom functionality in raw water(carboxylic group. meq/g Carbon)=38,51,1
Table13. Water quality in Yongyun treatment train=48,61,1
Table14. NOM property in pilot treatment train=49,62,1